LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. QooCam EGO vs C300

Kandao QooCam EGO vs SJCAM C300

What QooCam EGO does better (1) and where C300 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Kandao QooCam EGO
Kandao · 2022QooCam EGO
1 advantage≈ $270
vs
SJCAM C300
SJCAM · 2023C300
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
5.2Photo7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

QooCam EGOC300
94 × 52.822130 × 3222.2
QooCam EGOC300Difference
Height52.8 mm32 mm+20.8 mm
Width94 mm130 mm−36 mm
Depth22 mm22.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight160 g31 g+129 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is QooCam EGO better than C300?

  1. Main screen size2.54″ vs 1.33″+91%

Why is C300 better than QooCam EGO?

  1. Weight160 g vs 31 g5.2×
  2. Max video resolution1080p vs 4K
  3. Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 2,800 mAh2.1×
  4. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  5. Max field of view79° vs 154°+95%
Specifications

Side by side

SJCAM C300SJCAM C300≈ $907.4
Design & durability
Weight160 g31 g
Width94 mm130 mm
Height52.8 mm32 mm
Depth22 mm22.2 mm
Waterproof without case—0 m
Waterproof with housing—30 m
Ingress protection—IP68
Min operating temperature—-10 °C
Video
Max video resolution1080p4K
4K frame rate (max)—30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVCYesYes
Timelapse / hyperlapse—Yes
Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec)—Yes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution—20 MP
Aperturef/1.8—
Max field of view79°154°
RAW photosYes—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system6-Achsen StabilisationGyroskopischer Bildstabilisator
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2.54″1.33″
TouchscreenYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,340 mAh2,800 mAh
Battery life (recording)—360 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam mode—Yes
Live streaming—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card—128 GB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare