LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. QooCam EGO vs SJ30

Kandao QooCam EGO vs SJCAM SJ30

What QooCam EGO does better (1) and where SJ30 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Kandao QooCam EGO
Kandao · 2022QooCam EGO
1 advantage≈ $270
vs
SJCAM SJ30
SJCAM · 2026SJ30
7.7Score
4 advantages≈ $260
Higher score
5.2Photo6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

QooCam EGOSJ30
94 × 52.82274 × 5238
QooCam EGOSJ30Difference
Height52.8 mm52 mm+0.8 mm
Width94 mm74 mm+20 mm
Depth22 mm38 mm−16 mm
Weight160 g162 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is QooCam EGO better than SJ30?

  1. Depth22 mm vs 38 mm+73%

Why is SJ30 better than QooCam EGO?

  1. Max video resolution1080p vs 8K
  2. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  3. Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 2,000 mAh+49%
  4. Max field of view79° vs 140°+77%
Specifications

Side by side

SJCAM SJ30SJCAM SJ30≈ $2607.7
Design & durability
Weight160 g162 g
Width94 mm74 mm
Height52.8 mm52 mm
Depth22 mm38 mm
Waterproof without case—5 m
Min operating temperature—-20 °C
Max operating temperature—45 °C
Video
Max video resolution1080p8K
4K frame rate (max)—30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVCYesYes
Timelapse / hyperlapse—Yes
Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec)—Yes
Sensor & photo
Sensor size—1/2"
Sensor size (optical format)—0.5″
Photo resolution—48 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Max field of view79°140°
Lenses—2
RAW photosYes—
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system6-Achsen Stabilisation6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2.54″2.51″
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
Direct wireless mic connection—Yes
External microphone support—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity1,340 mAh2,000 mAh
Battery life (recording)—150 min
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Webcam mode—Yes
Live streaming—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card—512 GB
Voice control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare