- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam EGO vs Mi Sphere
Kandao QooCam EGO vs Xiaomi Mi Sphere
What QooCam EGO does better (2) and where Mi Sphere wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Photo3.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
QooCam EGOMi Sphere
| QooCam EGO | Mi Sphere | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 52.8 mm | 67 mm | −14.2 mm |
| Width | 94 mm | 78 mm | +16 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 24 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 108 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QooCam EGO better than Mi Sphere?
- Aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
- Depth22 mm vs 24 mm+9%
Why is Mi Sphere better than QooCam EGO?
- Max video resolution1080p vs 2.7K
- Weight160 g vs 108 g+48%
- Battery capacity1,340 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 108 g |
| Width | 94 mm | 78 mm |
| Height | 52.8 mm | 67 mm |
| Depth | 22 mm | 24 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 45 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 1080p | 2.7K |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.44″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 24 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 79° | — |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.54″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,340 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
