- Clippertoday
- Compare
- PilotPano vs XSNAP2
Labpano PilotPano vs Nilox XSNAP2
What PilotPano does better (6) and where XSNAP2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is PilotPano better than XSNAP2?
- Max video resolution5.7K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Battery capacity2,300 mAh vs 900 mAh2.6×
- Sensor size (optical format)0.44″ vs 0.25″+74%
- Main screen size3.1″ vs 2″+55%
- Max field of view210° vs 170°+24%
Why is XSNAP2 better than PilotPano?
- Weight295 g vs 56 g5.2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 56 g |
| Width | 138 mm | — |
| Height | 54.5 mm | — |
| Depth | 45.7 mm | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 40 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5.7K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/4" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.44″ | 0.25″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 210° | 170° |
| RAW photos | Yes | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 3.1″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,300 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Live streaming | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
