- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam FUN vs Theta SC2
Kandao QooCam FUN vs Ricoh Theta SC2
What QooCam FUN does better (4) and where Theta SC2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Video2.4
9.0Photo2.6
5.1Battery3.3
Why is QooCam FUN better than Theta SC2?
- Sensor size (optical format)1″ vs 0.44″2.3×
- Weight70 g vs 104 g+49%
- Battery life (recording)80 min vs 60 min+33%
- Aperturef/1.9 vs f/2+7%
Why is Theta SC2 better than QooCam FUN?
- Max video resolution2.5K vs 4K
- Max field of view200° vs 360°+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 104 g |
| Width | — | 130.6 mm |
| Height | — | 45.2 mm |
| Depth | — | 22.9 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 1″ | 0.44″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 200° | 360° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 0.5″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 920 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 80 min | 60 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
