- Clippertoday
- Compare
- QooCam FUN vs Theta X 2023
Kandao QooCam FUN vs Ricoh Theta X 2023
What QooCam FUN does better (4) and where Theta X 2023 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Video7.7
9.0Photo5.0
5.1Battery2.3
Why is QooCam FUN better than Theta X 2023?
- Weight70 g vs 170 g2.4×
- Sensor size (optical format)1″ vs 0.5″2×
- Battery life (recording)80 min vs 55 min+45%
- Aperturef/1.9 vs f/2.4+28%
Why is Theta X 2023 better than QooCam FUN?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Max video resolution2.5K vs 8K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity920 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 70 g | 170 g |
| Width | — | 51.7 mm |
| Height | — | 136.2 mm |
| Depth | — | 29 mm |
| Min operating temperature | — | 0 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.5K | 8K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 1″ | 0.5″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4 |
| Max field of view | 200° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.25″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 920 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 80 min | 55 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
